I Stand With UCI
Mist over the Adirondack High Peaks at first light

APA Project P2021-0276 · Hearing October 28, 2026

A New York case. A question for every American.

Private property. Due process. Government accountability. These principles matter wherever you live. UCI’s fight to conduct defense research in the Adirondacks raises a larger question: how long should a business have to wait for government to make a decision?

I stand with UCI because I believe Americans deserve clear rules, fair treatment, and accountable public officials. Explore the record, understand what is at stake, and help demand action.

You do not need to live in New York to make your voice heard.

Application submitted

2021

Proposed firings

30 / year

Explosive warheads

0 proposed

Hearing

Oct. 28

Read the case without taking the campaign's word for it.

The site separates project facts, official filings, reported claims, legal analysis, and campaign opinion. The APA's own hearing record remains linked throughout.

Project facts →

What you are asking

Support UCI. Demand a decision.

UCI applied to the Adirondack Park Agency in 2021 to test the internal ballistics of 155-millimeter cannon barrels on private land in the Town of Lewis, Essex County. Steel projectiles are proposed, explosive warheads are not, and a projectile-catching system has been proposed.

Supporting UCI does not mean abandoning environmental review. It means requiring the APA to operate through objective standards, technical evidence, reasonable conditions, and a decision. If legitimate concerns can be mitigated, the proper response is to write those conditions and let the work proceed.

The campaign also asks Adirondack Park counties to pursue coordinated review through the Local Government Review Board under Executive Law section 803-a. The precedent matters beyond one howitzer application; the next stalled applicant could be proposing housing, forestry, manufacturing, telecommunications, energy, or tourism.

The constitutional case

Regulatory authority is bounded authority.

Start with the four strongest present theories in sixty seconds, then open the full memorandum and the underlying public record.

Read the case

The Case for Accountability

Read the full argument

All articles →

The Case for Accountability · Article I

When the Process Becomes the Problem

How a permit application can become a test of whether government is still capable of reaching a clear, evidence-based decision.

Read article →

The Case for Accountability · Article II

When Government Cannot Define Yes

A permit system fails when an applicant cannot learn what measurable conditions would turn delay into approval.

Read article →

The Case for Accountability · Article III

The Power to Outlast

Delay is not neutral when the state can wait indefinitely and a private applicant must continue paying to remain in the process.

Read article →

Who is behind this?

A citizen campaign, not an anonymous advocacy page.

I Stand With UCI is run by James Lacey in Rome, New York. The campaign page explains how I became involved, what I believe, what this site is not, and how the outreach effort has developed.

About the campaign
Send letter Case facts