
The Case for Accountability · Article I
When the Process Becomes the Problem
How a permit application can become a test of whether government is still capable of reaching a clear, evidence-based decision.
Read article →
APA Project P2021-0276 · Hearing October 28, 2026
Private property. Due process. Government accountability. These principles matter wherever you live. UCI’s fight to conduct defense research in the Adirondacks raises a larger question: how long should a business have to wait for government to make a decision?
I stand with UCI because I believe Americans deserve clear rules, fair treatment, and accountable public officials. Explore the record, understand what is at stake, and help demand action.
You do not need to live in New York to make your voice heard.
Application submitted
2021
Proposed firings
30 / year
Explosive warheads
0 proposed
Hearing
Oct. 28
Read the case without taking the campaign's word for it.
The site separates project facts, official filings, reported claims, legal analysis, and campaign opinion. The APA's own hearing record remains linked throughout.
What you are asking
UCI applied to the Adirondack Park Agency in 2021 to test the internal ballistics of 155-millimeter cannon barrels on private land in the Town of Lewis, Essex County. Steel projectiles are proposed, explosive warheads are not, and a projectile-catching system has been proposed.
Supporting UCI does not mean abandoning environmental review. It means requiring the APA to operate through objective standards, technical evidence, reasonable conditions, and a decision. If legitimate concerns can be mitigated, the proper response is to write those conditions and let the work proceed.
The campaign also asks Adirondack Park counties to pursue coordinated review through the Local Government Review Board under Executive Law section 803-a. The precedent matters beyond one howitzer application; the next stalled applicant could be proposing housing, forestry, manufacturing, telecommunications, energy, or tourism.
The constitutional case
Start with the four strongest present theories in sixty seconds, then open the full memorandum and the underlying public record.
Act, investigate, and verify
The Case for Accountability

The Case for Accountability · Article I
How a permit application can become a test of whether government is still capable of reaching a clear, evidence-based decision.
Read article →
The Case for Accountability · Article II
A permit system fails when an applicant cannot learn what measurable conditions would turn delay into approval.
Read article →
The Case for Accountability · Article III
Delay is not neutral when the state can wait indefinitely and a private applicant must continue paying to remain in the process.
Read article →Rome to the Park
Each county page now works as a direct landing page with local context, its public directory, and a letter form preselected for that county.
Full directoryJoin the campaign
Join the Discord, follow I Stand With UCI on Facebook, or wear the Accountability Is Coming campaign shirt.

I Stand With UCI Discord
Follow updates, discuss the public record, and coordinate outreach.
Open Discord

I Stand With UCI on Facebook
Campaign updates, articles, county outreach, and hearing developments.
Open Facebook

View the campaign shirt using the actual finished shirt mockup.
View the shirt
Who is behind this?
I Stand With UCI is run by James Lacey in Rome, New York. The campaign page explains how I became involved, what I believe, what this site is not, and how the outreach effort has developed.